Relationship between Income Inequality & Crime-Samples for Students

Question: Write a Reflective essay over relationship between income inequality and crime. Answer: This reflective essay is based on the topic income inequality and crime. It is based over two previous assessments which are also based on the same topic. There are various reasons which are responsible for occurrence of crime and income inequality is one of those aspects which lead to occurrence in crime. In order to control crime rate, it is necessary to develop strict rules and regulations. Penalties associated with the crime are majorly responsible for the crime rate. Apart from the income, there are various sociological factors which affect the crime rate and some of those sociological factors are unfair treatment, discrimination practices, etc. The major focus of this reflection essay will be based over the relationship between income inequality and crime. I have learnt that income inequality plays crucial role in occurrence of crime and income distribution is one of those factors which lead to occurrence of crime in developed countries. Globalisation is also one of those factors which lead to occurrence of crime as it has filches employment opportunities from the local residents (Pickett Wilkinson, 2015). I have also realised that multinational and other large companies are moving towards the cheap markets of Asian countries in order to reduce cost of production and this has generated unemployment in the developed countries. People have lost their jobs due to globalisation and due to aggressive competition. In these scenarios, people have moved towards the negative aspects such as crime and other related activities for their livelihoods. I have learnt that information technology has acquired a large part of the market and with this, requirement of skilled and educated labours have been increased. Due to this, unskilled labours do not get relevant chance to justify themselves. Therefore they choose alternative ways for their survival and for improving their financial conditions (Cooper, Kennelly, Durazo-Arvizu, Oh, Kaplan Lynch, 2016). According to my experience, for living a healthy and basic life, it is necessary to get educated, skilled and gain specialization in any field as per the individuals interest. This helps an individual to find the most appropriate manner in order to get a job or find a way to satisfy his or her needs. But people who could not able to get all these facilities due to low financial conditions or due to other factors such as low cast, discriminatory practices followed by the rich and high class people, etc. This decreases the morale of the people and fills an immense level frustration to prove themselves in front of the society irrespective of the way chosen and sometimes, this let them towards anti-social activities to bring out frustration as well as to prove themselves. I have researched on this topic and found that majorly it is seen in under developed countries (Enamorado, Lpez-Calva, Rodrguez-Casteln Winkler, 2016). This is because those countries have various issues such as high u nemployment rate, huge population, practices of unfair treatment, discrimination, etc. Due to these factors, competition amongst the individuals increases and people who are skilled enough get the opportunity and uneducated and unskilled people chose the anti-social way to survive as well as to fulfil their basic needs. Though, anti-social activities are risky but people with less education and with fewer capabilities adopt these ways to snatch the money from rich people along with ignoring the risk involved in those activities (Buttrick Oishi, 2017). Distribution of income is based over the individuals effectiveness and efficiency but sometimes, people found this distribution system of income as unfair treatment which leads to generation of disputes. As per the discussion in previous tasks that before 1965, US were suffering from huge crime rate and the major reason behind was lack of education. Most of the criminals arrested were found college dropouts and they take support of anti-social activities for their livelihoods as well as to attain the higher position in the life. Crime is associated with acquiring short term benefits and these cannot be obtained from the legal activities. I have also learnt that therefore, poor people are generally found engaged in executing illegal activities for acquiring short term benefits. Rich people need to put comparatively less efforts to attain success because they receive luxury and comfort from their birth. On the other hand, poor people need to fight with circumstances to uplift their lif e standards. This is the major reason that I had learnt from studying the relationship between income inequality and crime. Poor people found illegal way ore easier in compared to legal activities for gaining success and growth in their life (Eckenrode, Smith, McCarthy Dineen, 2014). Crime has several types such as theft, robbery, kidnapping, murder, extortion, etc. All these are performed for different objectives but the major objective is earning or snatching money in short period of time. I have also learnt that there are various other objectives which lead to occurrence of crime and dissatisfaction is one of those perspectives. Dissatisfaction towards life, towards work and other parts may force the individual to opt the negative manner or anti-social activity for reducing the gap between dissatisfaction and satisfaction as this seems to be the shortest way to overcome with the issues. This can be understood with the research that daily more than 200,000 rape cases are being reported across the globe. Apart from recorded cases, there are various other which are not reported due to societys pressure, or due to other sorts of pressure (Thompson Gartner, 2014). Rape is also a part of crime but this is not because income inequality, infect this is due to dissati sfaction. To stop these types of illegal practices, according to my point of view, government authorities should impose heavy penalties on such criminal practices. Penalties and crimes both have unique and direct connection, the more will be penalty, crime rate will be less but in the countries where penalties for such incidents are not heavy or strict, and occurrence rate of crime is quite high (Pare Felson, 2014). In relevance with the relationship amongst the crime rate and thee income inequality, it has been observed that there are various countries in the globe which have controlled this rate. In order to remove this to the fullest, it is necessary to adopt certain crucial and advanced measures. As per my opinion, the only way to stop these crimes are imposing penalties and providing all those facilities and the services to the poor people who could easily be consumed and attained by rich people easily and effectively. This will generate equal opportunities for both rich and poor people and on the basis of capabilities and efficiency; they will get their roles accordingly. Government bodies should also introduce certain awareness programs through which people should be informed regarding the penalties for performing any type of illegal activities. Apart from this, I have also experienced that fear is not the only measure to stop crime; there are several others also such as reducing the gap of income inequality (Schneider, 2016). Apart from these factors, disposable income of an individual is also a great source of increasing the unequal distribution of income. Rich people are majorly found doing this and this is known as showing less total earned income in order to reduce the tax payable to the government (Rueda Stegmueller, 2016). This ultimately reduces the purchasing power of the consumers and hence, it leads to black money. Corruption is the biggest limitation of inequality in income distribution system (Cheung Lucas, 2016). Thus, I suggest the government to develop strong rules, regulations and the policies for collection of tax and revenues so that rich people could not be able to show less income compared to the actual earned income. This will increase the earning of government and thus, they will easily be able to adopt certain effective measures to provide better facilities and services to poor people in order to reduce unequal distribution of income. Ultimately it will help the country to increas e its GDP as well as provide opportunities for being a developed country (Wang, Pan Luo, 2015). According to my opinion, in order to reduce the crime rate, country and its authorities are responsible for taking certain crucial steps in order to generate and provide employment opportunities, opportunity to learn as well as sundry other opportunities to prove their capabilities. This will help the poor people to get a satisfactory as well as effective chance to grow along with their families. This will also leads to increase in the GDP of the country which will ultimately result in growth and development of the whole country (Kawachi Subramanian, 2014). Thus, it could be said that income inequality is the strong evidence of increasing criminal activities. These activities are also known as anti-social and illegal activities. This reflective essay is based over my personal experience, learning and opinions over relationship between income inequality and crime. There are various reasons which are discussed in this essay which are responsible for the generation of crime. Various strategies have also been discussed in relevance with reducing the crime rate. References Buttrick, N. R., Oishi, S. (2017). The psychological consequences of income inequality.Social and Personality Psychology Compass,11(3). Cheung, F., Lucas, R. E. (2016). Income inequality is associated with stronger social comparison effects: The effect of relative income on life satisfaction.Journal of personality and social psychology,110(2), 332. Cooper, R. S., Kennelly, J. F., Durazo-Arvizu, R., Oh, H. J., Kaplan, G., Lynch, J. (2016). Relationship between premature mortality and socioeconomic factors in black and white populations of US metropolitan areas.Public health reports. Cushing, L., Morello-Frosch, R., Wander, M., Pastor, M. (2015). The haves, the have-nots, and the health of everyone: the relationship between social inequality and environmental quality.Annual Review of Public Health,36. Eckenrode, J., Smith, E. G., McCarthy, M. E., Dineen, M. (2014). Income inequality and child maltreatment in the United States.Pediatrics,133(3), 454-461. Enamorado, T., Lpez-Calva, L. F., Rodrguez-Casteln, C., Winkler, H. (2016). Income inequality and violent crime: Evidence from Mexico's drug war.Journal of Development Economics,120, 128-143. Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S. V. (2014). Income inequality.Social epidemiology,126. Pare, P. P., Felson, R. (2014). Income inequality, poverty and crime across nations.The British journal of sociology,65(3), 434-458. Pickett, K. E., Wilkinson, R. G. (2015). Income inequality and health: a causal review.Social science medicine,128, 316-326. Rueda, D., Stegmueller, D. (2016). The externalities of inequality: Fear of crime and preferences for redistribution in Western Europe.American Journal of Political Science,60(2), 472-489. Schneider, S. M. (2016). Income inequality and subjective wellbeing: Trends, challenges, and research directions.Journal of Happiness Studies,17(4), 1719-1739. Thompson, S. K., Gartner, R. (2014). The spatial distribution and social context of homicide in Torontos neighborhoods.Journal of research in crime and delinquency,51(1), 88-118. Wang, P., Pan, J., Luo, Z. (2015). The impact of income inequality on individual happiness: Evidence from China.Social Indicators Research,121(2), 413-435.